How Artists Coped With Hitler's Rule

Here’s a generally accepted syllogism: The Weimar Republic saw an explosion in the arts, particularly of modern forms like expressionist painting and atonal music. When Hitler swept away the freedoms of the Weimar era and assumed dictatorial powers, he targeted “degenerate art”—the Nazis’ designation for anything modern of which they disapproved. Ergo, the country’s most creative artists were forced into immediate opposition to Hitler’s regime.

 

There’s just one problem. As Jonathan Petropoulos convincingly demonstrates, this syllogism is sloppy at best—and in all too many cases, it’s dead wrong. To be sure, there were artists, such as the composer Kurt Weill and the playwright Bertolt Brecht, who fled Germany as soon as Hitler took power, both for personal and political reasons (Weill was Jewish, Brecht was a Marxist). Marlene Dietrich, who had already launched her career in Hollywood, famously and contemptuously rebuffed efforts by the Nazis to lure her back. She chose, instead, to become an American citizen, and during the war she made anti-Nazi broadcasts and offered memorable performances for American troops in North Africa and Europe. 

Read Full Article »
Comment
Show commentsHide Comments

Related Articles